• Case Studies Banner 1

    Case Studies

West London Waste Plan

In August 2013, BPP Consulting was commissioned to support six west London boroughs with the preparation of their Waste Local Plan.

Continue Reading
Kent Minerals & Waste Local Plan

In December 2014 BPP Consulting was commissioned to support Kent County Council with the Minerals & Waste Local Plan that had been submitted for examination prior to the lead officer taking early retirement.

Continue Reading
West Sussex Waste Local Plan

In Spring 2012, BPP Consulting was appointed to support West Sussex County Council (WSCC) in the preparation of their Waste Local Plan.

Continue Reading
West Sussex Waste Local Plan – Consultation Programme

BPP Consulting completed a commission from West Sussex County Council to provide support in preparing the West Sussex Waste Local Plan.

Continue Reading
West Sussex Minerals Local Plan

Commissioned in June 2015, BPP Consulting was asked to provide support to ensure that a Draft Minerals Local Plan and accompanying Sustainability Appraisal was completed by December 2015.

Continue Reading
Gloucestershire County Council - Javelin Park Energy from Waste Facility

In 2012, Gloucestershire County Council received a planning application for a large energy-from-waste facility, proposed for land at Javelin Park just off the M5.

Continue Reading
East Sussex South Downs and Brighton & Hove Waste and Minerals Plan

In March 2012 Ian Blake lead on a contract with East Sussex County Council (ESCC) to project manage the preparation of the East Sussex, South Downs and Brighton & Hove Waste and Minerals Plan.

Continue Reading
Essex Industrial Estates Project

BPP Consulting were commissioned by Essex County Council to prepare an evidence base report which provided an understanding of the practical and deliverability constraints associated with the location.

Continue Reading
Improving Waste Management in Flatted Properties in London -– London Waste and Recycling Board

London has a target of 50% recycling or composting of household collected waste by 2020, as reflected in the Mayor of London’s Municipal Waste Management Strategy and the London Plan.

Continue Reading
AD Facility Planning Feasibility Assessment

BPP Consulting undertook an initial appraisal of a site identified by a developer as the potential location for an anaerobic digestion facility.

Continue Reading
EIA of a proposed Holiday Park development

BPP Consulting was part of the team preparing an Environmental Statement that accompanied the application for development of a holiday park.

Continue Reading
West Sussex Waste Local Plan – Consultation Programme

Case Studies
West Sussex Waste Local Plan – Consultation Programme

West Sussex Waste Local Plan – Consultation Programme

Waste Local Plan Production Support – County Council

BPP Consulting completed a commission from West Sussex County Council to provide support in preparing the West Sussex Waste Local Plan.

This support was required to ensure that it successfully completed two consultation stages as follows:

  • Consultation under Regulation 18 on a draft version of the Plan
  • Consultation under Regulation 19 on the proposed submission Plan

The West Sussex Waste Local Plan proposed several sites for waste management, including thermal treatment. Each site provoked controversy due to the perceived nature of the impacts that would arise if a facility were to be developed.

For the consultation on the Draft Plan, BPP Consulting carefully prepared a consultation programme which involved an assessment of the stakeholders who needed to be consulted and an action plan for maximising the likelihood of these stakeholders becoming aware of the consultation and providing a response. The consultation programme also identified the need for explanatory publications. At all times the programme was prepared with an awareness that waste consultation and stakeholder input is a key element of ensuring that the Plan passes the legal compliance (including Duty to Cooperate) and soundness tests. With this in mind a thorough process was designed which would enable the authorities to effectively defend any challenge that the Plan had not been prepared with appropriate input from communities and other stakeholders.

The main categories of stakeholder identified were:

  • Residents of West Sussex
  • Residents living in close proximity to the proposed sites
  • Landowners
  • Parish Councils
  • Pre-established Community Liaison Committees
  • District and Borough Councils
  • Neighbouring and more distant Waste Planning Authorities
  • Local waste management industry
  • Statutory Bodies e.g. Environment Agency, Natural England etc.

Methods of engagement included the following:

  • Mailout/email to all stakeholders registered on the County Council’s Waste Local Plan consultation database
  • Press Releases – one at the start and one towards the end of the process
  • Meetings
  • Evening presentations to Community Liaison Committees
  • Presentation of information on the authorities’ websites including development of on-line response forms

Input to the Communications Programme was obtained from WSCC Communications Officer to ensure the consultation process met corporate standards for communicating with customers (e.g. ensuring that publications were prepared using the house style) and materials were written in ‘plain English’. As the Plan is joint with the South Downs National Park Authority similar liaison was also necessary. The programme was also designed to ensure that, as required by the regulations, it followed the approach set out in the both Authorities’ Statements of Community Involvement.

This programme of consultation elicited over 100 responses. In particular, the consultation drew out a landowner’s dissatisfaction with the inclusion of a particular site which lead to it being withdrawn from further consideration. It should be noted that it was important to establish the landowner’s position at this stage otherwise this may have resulted in the site, and possibly the entire Plan, being found undeliverable leading to difficulties with the Plan passing the deliverability soundness test. The consultation also identified uncertainty in the position of the landowner at a different site. Through a series of meetings and conversations, the landowner’s position was clarified and the site was included in the Proposed Submission Draft Plan with the reassurance that it had landowner support.

There is no doubt that the Plan was controversial but by being open and by showing a willingness to meet and discuss the Plan, the authorities were seen to be genuinely wishing to engage with local communities and were not open to the charges often levelled at officialdom that information had been witheld or deliberately concealed.

Related Studies